54126/6/48
Mi Fanclough
1. ch
para
of the Treasury
should study the
4
The 6.0.
3th) of the
notes of the meeting
2.3.50,
A
Jand
Allen report
من
whether
ނނ
Cherry
any factial pouss
possible
16
zel
arese".
2. At a
subequent
weeking
2
that of
under
necimed
de
understood from
ship were requisition
clan
ނ
with "Dewails" generally,
Axmwally representative
lost or damaged
To them, they
would
ropect of the Con
For
whals
pay
or damag
he know, settled
and
hand, 20
elamis
all such
3. Under the Comperation (Defence)
Regulations, 1900, beton ((1) prunes (ii),
the authonly
concerned
responsible for capital wit
whetter
frome
che
in
oberously
Care
'demal'
other
was
N
of her vessels,
aw craft. It seems therefore that
Admwalty's action referred to
was in
accordance
other
Any vessel
7
loss
damage,
vahneten
the
ammet
parce 2 above
with Depure Regulation
under requisition
which bring
Used
as
block ships
Remed
lost
w
or
them
withe
The
L
other
ways
au
a
legal liability
of Gors
and
affrankly
xope of prores (ii) above,
ал
the requestining
the Karbour Marker, the legal beablity
done by the
presumably against
Land
para seus of Allen's report.
잇어
H.-K. See
Under therefre
Ith enacts retrospective legislation depning
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.